Vu que mon anglais est loin d'être parfait je remercie d'avance ceux qui auront le courage de m'en dire plus.
J'ai fais aussi un hpicheck, je peux envoyer le fichier, mais il n'y a pas énormément d'informations négative je pense: https://www.dropbox.com/s/r3g3cb45vju3b ... Report.pdf
Merci

J'espère ne pas trop spammer le forum avec tt ça, sinon sry

There are no later tests for this Vehicle.


Most Recent Vehicle Details and Test Summary applicable to this Registration Certificate document reference number.

Registration mark:
X589UAY

Make/Model:
LOTUS / ELISE

Colour:
RED

VIN/Chassis No:
SCCGA1114YHC31121

Approximate date of first use:
05/12/2000

Type of fuel:
Petrol



Date of test:
11/05/2012

Certificate issued (Pass)

Odometer reading:
56,810 Miles

Test number:
649992932177

Test expiry date:
19/05/2013



Full Test History, starting with first recorded vehicle and test results


Registration mark:
330FRO

Make/Model:
LOTUS / ELISE

Colour:
RED

VIN/Chassis No:
SCCGA1114YHC31121

Approximate date of first use:
05/12/2000

Type of fuel:
Petrol



Date of test:
09/06/2006

Certificate issued (Pass)

Odometer reading:
32,578 Miles

Test number:
973540366106

Test station name:
COUNTY VEHICLE TESTING STATION

Test station number:
62946

Test station telephone number:
01162867227

Test class:
IV

Test expiry date:
08/06/2007

No Advisory Notice issued


Date of test:
31/07/2007

Certificate issue refused (Fail)

Odometer reading:
38,177 Miles

Test number:
171442717291

Test station name:
STANTON SERVICE STATION

Test station number:
62563

Test station telephone number:
01455271466

Test class:
IV

Reason(s) for refusal to issue Certificate

Nearside Rear Shock absorber has a serious fluid leak (2.7.3)

Offside Front Front wheel bearing rough when rotated (2.5.A.2)

Exhaust emissions Lambda reading after 2nd fast idle outside specified limits (7.3.D.4)

Exhaust has a major leak of exhaust gases (7.1.2)

No Advisory Notice issued


Date of test:
07/08/2007

Certificate issued (Pass)

Odometer reading:
38,194 Miles

Test number:
611869717257

Test station name:
STANTON SERVICE STATION

Test station number:
62563

Test station telephone number:
01455271466

Test class:
IV

Test expiry date:
06/08/2008

No Advisory Notice issued


Change of details

Registration mark:
330FRO recorded at time of test, changed to X589UAY on 15/08/2007 by DVLA.



Date of test:
11/08/2008

Certificate issue refused (Fail)

Odometer reading:
49,083 Miles

Test number:
941224528232

Test station name:
CAR & COMMERCIAL BODYSHOP LTD

Test station number:
8289BV

Test station telephone number:
01986892467

Test class:
IV

Reason(s) for refusal to issue Certificate

Front registration plate letter/figure missing (6.3.1c)

Nearside Front Steering rack gaiter split (2.2.D.2d)

Offside Front Steering rack gaiter split (2.2.D.2d)

Exhaust emissions carbon monoxide content after 2nd fast idle excessive (7.3.D.4)

Exhaust emissions carbon monoxide content at idle excessive (7.3.D.5)

Advisory Notice issued

Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)

Offside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)

Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)

Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)


Date of test:
04/12/2009

Certificate issued (Pass)

Odometer reading:
49,121 Miles

Test number:
244908839393

Test station name:
M R KING & SONS LTD

Test station number:
67420

Test station telephone number:
01986874464

Test class:
IV

Test expiry date:
03/12/2010

Advisory Notice issued

Windscreen has damage to an area less than a 10mm circle within zone 'A' (8.3.1a)


Date of test:
20/05/2011

Certificate issued (Pass)

Odometer reading:
53,302 Miles

Test number:
136460241199

Test station name:
JSM MOT CENTRE

Test station number:
V101332

Test station telephone number:
01617621111

Test class:
IV

Test expiry date:
19/05/2012

No Advisory Notice issued


Date of test:
03/05/2012

Certificate issue refused (Fail)

Odometer reading:
56,715 Miles

Test number:
655334122124

Test station name:
M D SPRING AUTOS

Test station number:
V101082

Test station telephone number:
01296 662280

Test class:
IV

Reason(s) for refusal to issue Certificate

Nearside Headlamp aim beam image kick up to the offside (1.8)

Nearside Headlamp aim too high (1.8)

Windscreen washer provides insufficient washer liquid (8.2.3)

Offside Steering rack insecure (2.2.B.1a)

Exhaust emissions carbon monoxide content after 2nd fast idle excessive (7.3.D.4)

Advisory Notice issued

Windscreen has damage to an area less than a 40mm circle outside zone 'A' (8.3.1d)


Date of test:
11/05/2012

Certificate issued (Pass)

Odometer reading:
56,810 Miles

Test number:
649992932177

Test station name:
M D SPRING AUTOS

Test station number:
V106465

Test station telephone number:
01296 662280

Test class:
IV

Test expiry date:
19/05/2013

Advisory Notice issued

Windscreen has damage to an area less than a 40mm circle outside zone 'A' (8.3.1d)


This completes the test history for the above vehicle as recorded on VOSA's MOT Computerisation Database

Ben rien de negatif sur le HPI ? ? ?

Le resumé du rapport (avec un gros point d'exclamation rouge) indique tout de meme "a mileage discrepancy" = Divergence de kilometrage.
En effet si on regarde le detail , elle passe de 62000 Mls en Fevrier 2010 à 53000 Mls en Juillet 2011. Ca peut etre une erreur lors d'un enregistrement du kilometrage.... ou autre chose, ca merite tout de meme explications de ton vendeur.

Clairement la voiture est presentee au MOT sans trop se tracasser de la faire passer ou non...
C'est pas tres cher de la faire passer un MOT via un garage qui sait regler l'auto avant, ca n'a pas l'air d'etre le cas ici.

il y a de fait un serieux souci au niveau du kilometrage

perso j irais pas plus loin, maos chacun fait selon sa sensibilité

Il est ou le souci ?

t as pas mis le kilométrage en 2010;)
depuis 2010 il a du rouler tout en marche arrière pour arriver au kilomètre de 2011 et 2012:)

Moi ca ne me choque pas.

62000 tout rond... moi ca me fait penser a un gars qui a noté de mémoire plus qu'une erreur.

Quand tu regardes l'ensemble, ca semble cohérent, il n'y a que cette donnée qui est étrange.

Elles viennent d'ou les donnée "NMR" ? des concession comme ici en belgique ?

heu... et qu elle ait 10.000 de moins le contrôle suivant ça ne t ennuie pas??:)

Je me trompe peut être, mais moi je pense que c'est une erreur humaine.
Du style c'était 52634 et le temps d'arriver a son bureau il a noté 62000.

Surtout que ca correspond au changement de moteur...

Donc pourquoi tricher sur une voiture ou on remplace le moteur ? surtout pour 10k miles.
Je vois pas trop d'intéret

au dela du probleme de kilometrage , comme twotone le souligne, le premier passage refusé a quasi tous les MOT est aussi interpellant sur l entretien général de l 'auto